walt bettinger national press club obama

bitcoins news night review

The decision was made in July, but has only come to light after reports in the Greek media during the past week. However, Goalbet — one of 24 operators granted a opap sports betting license in that was later revoked — argued that OPAP had never been asked to meet the conditions necessary for a Greek online sports betting license, and their license was therefore void. The loss of the licence, whether temporary or permanent, is not expected to have a major impact on the operator's sports betting revenue, which remains dominated by OPAP's retail offering. For the six months to 30 Junesports betting revenue was down 5. An OPAP spokesperson emphasised that the decision affected only a very small part of the company's revenue. The spokesperson added that the operator's main online business was run through Stoiximan, the igaming business in which OPAP holds a majority stake.

Walt bettinger national press club obama sports betting las vegas airport

Walt bettinger national press club obama

Honestly folks, is this the most important issue facing us this year? Record deficits, oil shocks, the continuing swamp of Iraq, another quarter of rising inflation and shrinking average incomes, job losses, and a complete and utter lack of respect for the United States around the world. However, until we live in a world where women are no longer raped, it must remain.

For now, we should focus on decreasing the number of abortions, rather than using the issue as a wedge to divide people and distract us from the real business of rehabilitating our economy, transforming our energy policy, extracting our military from an endless conflict, and taking care of the people who have ALREADY been born, and are suffering as we speak. He has no regard for human life. If the abortion does not kill the baby, just stick a fork in its head and kill it.

Check out his voting record. I could not morally support this person. The evangelicals demand the right to express and maintain their beliefs. How far away are they really from other world religions who preach that political behavior must match their theocratic tenants?

President Elect McCain was definitely the winner tonight! Many have said that they thought he had the questions ahead of time because of his quick, seemingly well prepared answers! Wrong — that was the mind of an experienced, knowledgeable and up-to-date leader ready to take over the position of President of the United States.

So much for the young, inexperienced — Prompter Reading — Flim Flam Obamaman — he is not ready nor will he ever be with his list of anti-American friends and associates. Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama side-stepped a pointed query about […]. Did he think that kind of too-clever-by-half smarmy answer would get him past such an important issue? And if you are really concerned about the disadvantaged, can there be a more disadvantaged class than babies in danger of being deprived of their life without due process?

You have to be kidding. I guess his masters over at pro choice and NOW will be happy but everyone else will see it as politics as usual. What other issues are above his pay grade. I guess any issue where he does not want to alienate his core base. Maybe you should have watched the show. If it had been a different audience, he would have given a different answer.

John McCain won the night handsdown! He showed he is a man of conviction. His answers were straight forward while Obama danced around the questions and left you unsure of just where he stood. Yep, Barry is not qualified to be a President yet. So of course we should all stop thinking and vote for this man. Obama voted to let live babies die if they were born alive following an abortion that failed.

Those who devalue life at the beginning, will devalue life at any age. I remember clearly being pro-life when I was a fetus. What a joke liberals are! That way you will not have to kill your unwanted baby son or baby daughter, who incidentally, only want you to love them and let them exist, if but for a brief moment in time.

This is a defining moment for both of these men. Kudos to Rick for asking the right question personhood There appear to be a lot of issues where the thoughtful resolution is above Sen. Trade policy, tax policy, international relations and virtually every religion-oriented question seem beyond his level of understanding. And they belive this because they can see human life beginning at conception under a microscope. How vile that Barack Hussein Obama would lie to that crowd and the entire TV and radio audience like that!

Obama is a typical Chicago politician. If Obama cannot tell us when he begins life begins—he is not ready-nor will he ever be ready to be a leader—he is only a showman. Coupled with his position that he actively opposed legislative attempts to provide comfort to babies who survived abortions. Moreover, he basically called America a selfish nation. We are the most-giving nation in the history of this planet.

Whenever there is a disaster, America is there to give, give and give. We, the citizens, give more money to charitable causes per capita than any other citizens of any nation on this earth. The poverty of the world is caused by ruthless dictators who want to control how we think, how we live, how we think, how we worwhip, what type of work we should do, and what we should eat….

These dictators.. Chavez, Castro, Putin, the Imams of the world, and the ilk are socialist and worse who are only concerned about staying in control and punishing their enemies. America is strong and the becon of freedom for the oppressed. It offers more opportunity than any nation in the history of the planet. We are free because Freedom is the core of all humam progress. If Mr. B Hussein Obama is not of the pay grade to make a judgement on Life or death in babies, then how can he consistently vote FOR abortion both first second third term abortion and Late term abortion.

Amazing that his followers will buy into his side stepped remark about abortion but then again is that not how he is running his campaign. Evade Evade Evade the questions and give round about answers. We reached the conclusion that the nicest thing that can be said about JM is that he sucks slightly less than BHO. I never thought it would come down to these two. The good news is that we survived LBJ and the Clintons, hopefully we can ride out either of these 15 watt bulbs.

If he made more millions in sweetheart deals, could he answer that? No, no and hell, no. BO stinks. His level of experience and lack of maturity indicate poor, if any, leadership qualities. On the other hand, McCain, is also in the special interest pockets. He abstained from the Medicare votes in June and July. His waffling and avoidance of addressing another hard issue are also indictments against him.

I honor his service and suffering at the hands of communists in Hanoi, BUT that does not make him presidential material, either. The USA is in trouble no matter who wins. We are getting partisan politicians, not real leaders for the most important job in the world. God help us all. It is ironic that my antispam work is life.

When will we stop the holocaust against the unborn? When will we be brave enough to say that these are not blobs but humans that only need time to develop to full maturity. Above your pay grade? That kind of weakness will not be rewarded with votes. Both candidates displayed themselves well. Obama was very thoughtful and McCain outperformed expectations. Oh My! What a craven response to a critical question. To make light of such a life and death issue, shows how Obama is unfit to collect a presidential pay-rate….

How can Obama claim to be a Christian or anyone claiming to be a Christian vote for Obama? Whether you believe that life begins at conception or later, Obama has done everything in his power to push for Partial-birth abortion and even supporting measures to allow a newborn who survived Partial-birth abortion to die.

You can call yourself a Christian but you are not a Christian if you support this barbaric, evil procedure or support anyone who does. He is running for the President of the United States of America! How much higher of a pay grade do you want? Once again, Obama fails to give a direct answer to a direct question. Also, he lacks the honesty to repeat his true ideas if it is in conflict with his audience.

I thought Obama did an excellent job at the forum! Obama is very thoughtful and intelligent! Obama showed his christianity unlike McCain who tried to be a jokster, story teller and duck and dodge some issues! McCain was cleary pandering! Obama was much more sincere! A person who never answers questions directly either cannot make up his mind or is trying to hide who he is and what he really thinks.

Obama has voted against legislation that protects the infant of a botched abortion if it born alive. Above his pay-grade? Does he not have an opinion on one of the most divisive subjsects in morality and poltics? Or, is he not willing to give his opinion in public for political reasons, and what kind of man would either question make him? If the issue is above his paygrade perhaps Barack is applying for the wrong job. What a wuss and cop-out answer. The slippery messiah yet again avoids answering directly, choosing instead to speak in parables that only his fellow Marxists will understand.

For Obama, who has never served in the Armed Forces, to use an expression that is widely used by those who have is ridiculous. To the actual question he was asked, the answer he should have given if he was HONEST in reflecting his evil views should have been after birth.

He could have went on to elaborate that, this is of course exclusive of a baby that was born alive after a botched abortion, which as we all know Obama believes is a non-person that can be left to die. The truth, as another pseudo-scientific media outlet used to say, is out there—and, as it turns out, science supports those conservative evangelicals.

Watched both Obama and McCain and the follow up reporters. We will include a McCain sticker on the sign. Thanks Rick Warren. His answer makes for a nice soundbite, but so do most of his canned responses. By that reasoning all invalids should just be left to fend for themselves. McCain was the clear winner of the debate at Saddleback Church. He was precise, honest and assertive in giving his answers to questions of great importance to the American people.

He is not ready to be President of the United States. And what job is it he wants again? Maybe this is a case where we can tell where he stands by his actions. While in the Illinois State Senate, he took to the floor to vote opposition to a bill which would mandate treatment for infants surviving their own abortion. It is unbelievable to me that anyone would vote for this man.

I guess his pay grade vassilates according to his voting block. Abortion is not birth control, it is murder. I had to prevent pregnancy if I wanted to have sex without conception and so do all other women. I repeat, Abortion is not birth control. In this day, no women gets pregnant unless she chooses. If the procedure is no different from, say, the removal of an unwanted mole—which is essentially what the argument for legalization is—then why expend resources to reduce its frequency?

God will not let the guilty go unpunished. He forgives but this nation will continue to pay the price. Where is the party of Harry Truman? Above his paygrade??? Surely no question is above his paygrade. As I recall, during the primary campaign McAmnesty was asked by a reporter what he would do if his daughter was raped and became pregnant.

He said they would seriously discuss having an abortion! Now he tells the evangelicals something completely different. The Delusional Right! Kill , Iraqis, 3. But Abortion…oh my god…what a heinous crime. One nation under surveillance with urine tests and wire taps for all. God Bless America…and all the used car salesmen evangelists…what a joke.

What did Jesus call us to do? He called us to be like him to look at his world as he would, to serve others as a higher calling than the Torah or law. When presented His earth on the day of judgement, how might Jesus respond to our stewardship? How might he respond to an abortion clinic? Obama and Gov. Do not let your logic be disuaded by your hatred of money or capitalism.

There is bad in all these things but there is good as well if used properly. I cannot find any positive attribute to abortion which as I understand it, kills tens of thousands of babies each year. Use your own gift of logic from there. Obama with out his teleprompters or 30 minute polished speeches showed to be a junior senator who need another 10 years of seasoning. McCain was on point and you know were he stands. We need more of these debates and great job getting away from the usual boring questions you hear every election year asked by the same lame so called journalist rooting for the liberal.

Obama tap-dances while McCain is straight to the point. When life begins is a religious question. Its a question that is answered in the privacy of people, their families and communities. The politicians pushing this issue have their hands in our pockets while trying to keep your eyes up our skirts. The politicians pushing this issue have their hands in your pocket while trying to keep your eyes up our skirts.

Barack could not say that life begins at conception-if he did how could he jusify the destrucion of a human life. Even if Barack believes life begins at conception-he will not publicley say so. Is all one has to do is look at his voting record on the issue of abortion to know what he is all about. Considering the dude has barely held a job for any substantial period of time other than signing up welfare recipients to vote Democratic there is very little that he is qualified to answer.

So Obama cannot bring himself to say a baby even partially out of the birth canal has no human rights. Forgive me for being a one position voter but this tells me all I need to know about Obama. Golly ,McCain sounds so wholesome one has the tendency to forget he voted to confirm Ginsberg,an official of the pro-abortin ACLU for the supremes.

Get the press out of the picture and let a common sense pastor take over and WOW you really get to see who these candidates running for president are. This turned out to be a great forum. I am pro-choice but after hearing 40 million abortions have taken place since Roe V Wade does make me think twice.

As Pastor Warren stated this would be considered a Holocaust. Also, double checked and Obama stated under the Bush admin abortions are up. He is wrong and should check his responses before stated non fact. Abortions are down under this administration.

Please if speaking deliver true facts, candidates. This is just a clever use of a phrase to appease the intended audience — without saying what you mean. He was honest, and said what they thought they wanted to hear. Give me a break! A pathetic respone by BO but the best he could do given his radical voting record, i. Worse, if the child manages to survive the attempted murder, err abortion, then BO supports letting the baby die of neglect.

It was not so long ago that someone with these radical views would be shunned and treated as a moral leper. The end is near. Obama does not want to state his known position on abortion. He may be trying to win over evangelicals but he surely will not change his pro abortion stance at the risk of infuriating his liberal base.

Why he even voted in support of killing babies that were born despite an attempted abortion! He talks about helping the disadvantaged. Who is more helpless than a child left to die? Despite that admission, Obama has consistently promoted the wanton destruction of innocent babies; including the Illinois case where he sued to kill child after it survived a failed abortion attempt.

I actually looked at this idea ahead of time…. McCain seemed to be rushing, especially in the first quarter of it, to get out his answers he had rehearsed. Thought this the best format ever to gain a perspective on each man. Knew Obama would be eloquent and feared for McCain in that regard.

Fears put to rest! Go McCain! I trust McCain completly with our country. Now, I can relax. Abortion is NOT a Contitutional government issue. You saw me before I was born and scheduled each day of my life before I began to breathe. Every day was recorded in your Book. By aborting more innocent lives? Sex outside of marriage, abortion, letting a little baby die outside the womb because of a botched abortion brings misery and suffering to all.

The question was direct, the answer shows intellectual arrogance. His pay grade is the top pay grade for leading the free world. What an idiot!! What always frustrates me is that such answers do not invite the logical follow-up question. The abortion debate is probably the most emotional and divisive one in American politics.

There are several issues, of course, that invite debate. At what point is a human being a human being? Most pro-lifers adamantly declare conception to be the answer. Regardless of whether one agrees with their resultant opinions, they are at least consistent. Some most? Again, agree or not, the resultant opinions from this view are logically consistent. But I would immediately ask him this question: How then can you advocate abortion?

In his case, how can he possibly defend late-term and partial-birth abortion if by his own admission it could be the killing of a viable human worthy of the right to life? I originally saw myself as pro-choice. I fully recognize that the beginning human life and rights can be defined somewhere other than at the two extremes usually put forth in the debate. I realized, however, that because I could not define that point scientifically or morally I also could not advocate killing a fetus.

The debate gets mired in euphemisms on both sides, and we lose sight sometimes of what we are debating. Abortion is most definitely the killing of something. If one can honestly believe that a fetus, any fetus, is NOT a human being then a pro-choice stance is defensible.

Both of these men are fence sitters. You can not be a Believer and be pro-choice, approve of same-sex marriage, or be ashamed to openly talk about your faith. Above his pay grade! All political questions are above his pay grade. He wants the highest office in the world. I hope he can answer the tough questions. I want to see his resume!!! Being a lawyer does not qualify in being a leader.

Dems should mute the speches and look to see what he did for Chicago. People should look at his associates. You are what you do, not what you say, and you are who you hang out with. Obama did his usual dancing around the questions, trying to evade a direct answer. John McCain was forth-coming with all of his answers. We certainly know where McCain stands on all of the issues, but we are still in the dark about Obama. He wants the American people to know him, then he needs to answers the questions asked of him.

He either did the politicians dance or he avoided any answer. What on earth did that mean??? I think the American people should watch out for the Change Obama will be bringing. Ye be warned…what a Clintonesque answer given by a man who claims to be a Christian…. Slavery was allowed because some were thought to be less than others. Pro life gives us all hope. This has been the on going problem with Obama. No precise answers and this comment speaks volumes.

I do not think the man knows himself as a person just his ambition to be President. I thought the forum in which this debate was done was one of the best I have ever seen. If Obama is for abortion on demand in all cases which is his official stand , why try to soft peddle it? Give me a break, the unborn are the single most defensless group in the world. I love it how the media trys to paint him as a centrist; but he is as far left as you can be.

Hussein Obama is the least qualified candidate for President in recent history, and his response to this simple question is illustrative. If you wish to defer to experts on matters of quantum physics, macro-economics, or ancient asian literature — fine. Second trimester? Third trimester? Six months? First birthday? Come on, Barack! It was a flippant answer to a serious question. The office of President of the United States is probably beyond his pay grade as well.

He has voted numerous times for the right to kill babies that have survived abortion. He has voted to support partial birth abortion. This man has no respect for life, at least when it comes to a baby, the one type of citizen and human that is completely dependent on adults for survival. Anyone who believes that they are a Christian and votes for Obama is simply deluded.

Obama is the most pro abortion candidate the Democrats could run. In the past he has supported even partial birth abortions which are in fact infanticide. The thinking of some so called Christians is so foggy it makes me sometimes doubt the wisdom of letting them vote at all. This guy continues to demonstrate that he has no theology and philosphy he is not willing to openly reveal to the American people. He is a trojan horse whether he knows it or not. He is the wrong person to be the President of the United States.

Before you vote for him…please listen carefully to what he says and review his record. My grandson Tyler is depending on it. Above his pay grade simply means only God knows the answer. The Bible is curiouly silent on abortion per se. That said, abortion is clearly not an ideal birth control. John McCain is obsessed with war.

If where were no war I think he would create one- just to be in battle. I dont trust him to run this country. People are laughing at his threats to Russia. Other countries are laughing at us. We have lost our credibility. China is calling the shots because of the massive loans…. Good job, John! Finally some Straight Talk Express right when we genuine social and fiscal conservatives need to see it! Not a meaningful change at all.

Abortion remains the ultimate child abuse, and candidates that support child abuse are disqualified regardless of their position on other issues. However last night, I was immensely impressed with his performance and his quick and comfortable answers to the questions. He was very good. What a coward; Obama should be proud of who he is and stand by his record of absolutely no limits on abortions at any stage, including after it is botched and the baby has a premature live birth If you cannot stand up for your own record then you are a no good politician… just like nearly all the other ones in the US Senate.

Obama is little more than the results of Marketing. Obama simply avoided stating his position. But his record on the right to life is perfectly clear: the state determines who has the right to life. With this as a premise, what good are any other human rights? Above his pay grade?! This guy is a scumbag supreme. McCain is not anti-abortion. He just wants to have sufficent future co-signers for his increased national debt. Were were they when they said it?

What are the exact quotes? Or were none willing to go on record? And why? He disgusts me. If answering the question on when life begins is above his pay grade, then maybe being President is above his pay grade. Does that mean if we pay him more money he will decide how moral he is? I can read your opinion between the lines, but still we need to be more forthright in our positions.

It is above his spiritual awarness. To him pregnancy is a sexually transmitted disease. Even when the goop comes out kicking and screaming it is still just goop. Young couples on the T. Heck, they will be glad to even share it with you.

Sex is the golden bull in Ameica. Advice to all: Instrumental worship is pure human vanity and is wholly inappropriate in the assembly. Put down your guitar, turn off your amplifier… And get on your knees.

Answering a question about abortion is above his pay grade…. Not with my vote! First, Obama backed out of the townhall debates—except one on July 4th when no one would be watching. After last night, Obama may try go into a complete four-corners stall and back out of the debates. Sorry, libs, but your guy is going into his convention limping. Without even facing McCain head-to-head, he got manhandled.

I think even Warren started turning on him and began enabling McCain by the end because he saw his book sales plunging if he were perceived as backing a candidate as loathsome as Obama. But we all know what happened. Spin on, libs. I think the considerable number of fencesitters saw in spades their choice—and their choice has to be McCain.

Above his pay grade, what a fool. What excuse will he use then? Obama may be eligible to run for president but he is not qualified to be president. Great job- John McCain. You had it all going in your faver. I hope the liberals can see what a fool OB made made of himself last night. Take a stand Obama. Be a leader. What else is above his paygrade? The economy? Take a look folks. Organizing communinty events in Chicago and days as US Senator is not enough experience to lead our country in the most difficult time our country has experienced.

Throughout the campaign, Obama has shown he is helpless without the teleprompter. The great orator is only that! He voted in Illinois that even an aborted baby that lives has no right to life. Most people would not consider throwing a puppy in the river, but Obama would throw a newborn baby that survived an abortion in the river! You cannot call yourself a Christian and vote for this men! This man is not ready for prime time!!!!! Senator Obama!!!! Why is it so hard to stand up for what is right?

It is wrong to abort babies, it is wrong to kill an innocent person. We only destroy our society by allowing abortion to continue. How many houses could have been bought or cars bought if we had allowed those babies to live, or what if we have killed the person who would have cured cancer.

We must elect those who are willing to preserve life and not be manbe pambe about their position. Must be this doubt just reciently sprang up since he voted twice against bills REQUIRING doctors, nurses and er staff to provide life-saving help to a baby born alive after an unsuccessful late term induced abortion.

What a great guy! How about the fact that he is running for President of the United States? What other answers are above his pay grade, and what about more complicated decisions that come with the presedency? Are we going to hear that those answers, too, are above his pay grade? Whatever your position on […]. Obama is pro-abortion, and now demonstrates himself to be a coward and not admit it.

Because he knows most of the country now knows what abortion really is — murder of innocent children. The most important issue in this campaign and in the United States right now, whether people realizes it or not, is the question of the protecting the rights of the marginalized, defenseless, voiceless sector of our society, which is the unborn. How can that not be the most important issue in the U. And we have Obama, who thinks that killing babies is a right that should be protected.

Talk about calling evil as good…and good as evil. At least McCain remains true to his anti-abortion convictions. Obama is again playing the politician- he has supported termination of life even if a fetus is born alive hence, a baby.

White-haired-wrinkly-guy seemed emotionally unstable at times, especially when the talk turned to issues of war. His answers were terse and angry- not thoughtful. And there was no sense of thoughtful kindness or caring about him. He was jumpy and had a harshness about him that he tried to cover up with jokes and laughing. My father was a prisoner of war. The emotional scars last a lifetime and sometimes erupt in violence.

McCain is scary. Obama looked like a sleeze with his smirk and cool demeaner. His body language showed that most things he was saying was made up as he went and to me that says he was trying to say things to make who he was talking to happy. I found that to be a ridiculously horrible answer that demonstrated to me that Mr. Obama is a candidate who is afraid of making a stand on a very legitimate issue because of which voting block he might offend.

I am very disappointed in how Mr. Obama answered this question and it has me now seriously questioning whether or not I can support him. A president must not only be willing to take tough stands and make tough decisions, he must understand that sometimes his decisions, and abortion is certainly one of them, have to be steered by his own moral compass and not by the ramifications those decisions have on his popularity. By avoiding the question in this way Mr. Obama showed he either has not developed his own set of convictions on this issue or even worse, he is not willing to stand behind them.

So a woman gets post-partum depression from giving birth, what does she get from an abortion. Weasel is as weasel does. How would you know Mr days of Senate experience? To hell with these worthless, aimless, characters! I refuse to vote for either one of them! Rather he is the only one for leadership and an administration with vision.

The democrats view him with considerable disdain. They view anyone with fresh thinking as an idealogue. That is simple to understand when you consider that democrats have no fresh ideas of their own. John McCain is a good man. But the problem is that he is lacking in vision and leadership qualities. He alwsays pursues a strategy rather than a vision of his own. After all he has the most anti-life record in the senate, and that is saying a lot.

His statement at the beginning about how we treat the least among us referring to the poor was such an obvious opening for Rick to ask about his voting to keep from giving medical care for babies who survived an abortion.

How cruel can you get? And he is for the poor? I admire any man who stands up for the unborn, and of course their mothers who are usually forced or co-erced into abortion. I am praing for McCain, especiall concerning the Supreme Court. The question was not about whether or not Obama was smart enough to answer it but whether or not he was wise and compassionate enough to wrestle with a very human problem. What a weasley and cowardly answer. At its best it was completely cerebral without any thought for the child at all, only about protecting himself.

My God, what a self-centered idiot. So Obama is willing to allow murder in his ignorance? How stupid can you get Obama? Above your pay grade??? I am confused. He is not going to tell us until we elect him president? Why would he duck that question! Otherwise, birth control would be just wrong.

However, when life begins, thats a whole nuther ballgame. What a difference! Obama was all about style and equivocating gibberish. McCain was all about blunt substance, experience and facts. What a wishy washy non-answer from Obama. No kidding its ethical and moral but where does he specifically stand?

When he is President, will his pay scale be high enough to give an honest answer to the full term, born alive question? Obama is a weasel, he is the most pro-abortion Senator in the Senate, he even voted against the rights of a child who survives a partial-birth abortion, he is trying to have it both ways and should not be able to get away with it. His radical pro-abortion views deserve no support from people of faith and his unwillingness to come clean about his views exhibit his untrustworthiness.

A boxer who likes to bob and weave,,, and another came to fight…you guess which is which. He could have opted out for adoption and gotten more votes. Saying that it is up to God to decide is a cop out. What a cowardly answer from Obama. Man or monster?

You decide. NObama knows when life begins, knows that a woman has a right to choose. Barry Houssain Obama is a phoney and an empty suit. He has a look in his eyes like he has sold his soul and is on a runaway train with no control.

Most people would be in favor of saving the life of a baby born alive after an abortion. Obama voted against a bill that would save a baby born alive after an abortion which answers the question about when Obama would afford human rights to an unborn baby. Answer: never, making Obama an extremist when it comes to being pro abortion and out of sync with the majority of Americans, I would say even the world. I would go so far to say that most Americans do not want someone in the White House who appears to be in favor of infanticide.

The fact that Obama will not vote for three different bills that prevent babies from dying of neglect after failed abortions tells me all I need to know about this monster. This is incredible! So when is it, Obama? It seems that the people above his pay grade here are Planned Parenthood, who he answers to on this issue. If he ran his campaign on his true left wing radical liberal beliefs he would have no chance. John McCain gave a perfect performance last night. If you vote for The Chosen One, you will derserve everything you get.

Unfortunately, so will all Americans. Everytime I start to warm up to him, he does, or publicly considers doing something to turn away the base. The latest? Trouble with Russia? Solving problems with radical Muslims? Too much govt waste? His qualifications are almost minimum wage. Hey Obama, nothing like avoiding the question! I was most interesting to watch the eye contact,or lack thereof as well as the general body language.

Who do you think you would do business on a handshake with? I watched the entire show. Felt J. How about visualizing the heartbeat at 6 weeks after conception. Nurse Stanek was fired from her job for going to the head of the hospital about it. He then accused the nurse of wanting to do away with Roe v. What a jerk! And you want this creep to be our President?! If Obama is going to push his view and back legislation in relation to abortion, he should have an answer to that question that he can explain in a thoughtful manner.

If Obama believes that abortion is above his pay grade he is unfit to serve as President. As President he would have to enforce our rights under the Constitution. The primary right of all being Life. If a President is unwilling to obey that, he would be willing to disregard every other right we have. Every President since Roe has failed in their duty to protect the lives of the innocent babies that have been denied their fundamental right.

Roe is a court opinion, not law. Courts do not make law, take the time to read the Federalists Papers and you will discover this lost principle. The President has a Constitutional duty to ignore an illegal court opinion. Life does begin at conception, which makes abortion wrong. If Obama was a true Christian he would realize this. Jesus kept them separate, He did not combine the two. So, a Christian can not except abortion as Obama does. Obama is a showman and the picture of a politician.

He knows that his stance on abortion is extraordinarily distasteful to many Americans he supports partial-birth abortions. I believe life begins at conception. If you support partial-birth abortions, life begins immediately after birth.

Still simple. Simply barbaric. That is to say, only God can say when life begins. Besides, evangelicals ought to start respecting the sanctomy of life of all the innocent Iraqi people who have been murdered by the American government. Judging from the sexist campaign that the Obama machine ran against Clinton in the primaries, I would say that the US Presidency is above his pay grade as well. Hussein proved to be the slick political hack he really is. On most questions he did the rope a dope coming down on both sides of the issues and avoiding specific answers.

The best example of this was the question on when do you believe life begins. Anyway, take the teleprompter and the expertely written speach away from Hussein and he is just a double talking hack and empty suite novice! So Obama wants to be president? Or should we judge him now on his unwillingness to answer questions? What an Empty Suit. Whether your pro-life or pro-abortion rights, this fool should at least be required to answer question.

How arrogant it that? Over and over Obama has shown his arrogance. Kudos for McCain. If there is any question who should be President, look at the way they answer the question. Obama supports late term abortions vehemently, but dances around the issue when dealing with people of faith. McCaim sticks to his position. We are tired of having the last two Presidents who lied all the time.

You are applying to be the leader of the free world. You are it! This man is without a soul. He needs someone to tell him when life begins? He is also a coward, fearful to stand on principle for anything. I take that back, he is not afraid to take a stand against the voiceless and the powerless. Absolutely, Mr Obama was certainly out of his depth and probably far below his pay-grade. He is used to speaking with a teleprompter and a mike in his ear.

I wonder what other issues, that are important to the American people, are above his paygrade. Is the Presidency above his paygrade as well? He did not side step the question, he told the truth. Eternally above his pay grade. I am a mother of four high risk pregnancies. And each time I have to come to terms with the fact that the life inside me does not belong to me, but to God only.

Barak Obama knows that an unborn child is in the balance between heaven and earth… this is an issue that involves God, mother, and child — Not some mere man. This is the stuff of Personal Spiritual Warfare and the government cannot go there — not even if they try.

It is a profound loss. But so is an abused and neglected unwanted child. So is an orphan trapped in a system that is incapable of true love. So are parents who are lost under a burden they cannot bear. So is a world with an all but forgotten population of orphans. And we all no that a president cannot make abortion just go away, legal or not.

With growing international recognition of the danger to public health the World Health Organization poses, it is pleasing to see that across the pond a bi-partisan committee has been established to launch an inquiry into the scandal-prone taxpayer-funded bureaucracy. The Americans for Tax Reform Affiliate, the Property Rights Alliance, submitted the following testimony to the Inquiry full version with citations may be downloaded here :. There is a consensus in the United Kingdom among academics, scientists, and the medical community that reduced-risk tobacco alternatives such as vaping e-cigarettes are significantly less harmful than smoking combustible cigarettes.

In addition to their relative safety compared to combustible tobacco, scientific data support the function of vaping products as a successful quit aid tool considerably more effective than traditional nicotine replacement therapies. A study by the U. National Health Service published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that e-cigarettes may help adults quit. According to a report commissioned on e-cigarettes by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine which analyzed the findings of peer-reviewed studies, it was determined that there is moderate evidence that risk and severity of dependence are lower for e-cigarettes than combustible tobacco cigarettes.

It assessed the results of 50 studies from across 13 jurisdictions, representing 12, participants. As a result of their effectiveness as an aid to quit smoking, e-cigarettes have become extremely popular, increasing from about seven million users in to 41 million in Euromonitor International. Over the next 10 years about six million premature deaths could be averted, if most smokers switched to e-cigarettes.

With the introduction of e-cigarettes, a rapid drop in the smoking rate has coincided from Public Health England has played a significant role in advancing evidence-based policymaking and ensuring that alternative nicotine delivery devices, which are less harmful than smoking, are available to smokers who are trying to quit.

As such, this is in line with Government Policy to reduce mortality rates. Evidence has demonstrated that recent policies promulgated have not only strayed from this goal but are in active opposition to it. While the UK has played a positive role in terms of reducing the burden of people smoking, and with e-cigarettes helping millions of adult smokers quit smoking, it is disturbing that the World Health Organization thus far refuses to acknowledge the science and is actively advising governments against effective tobacco harm reduction policies.

The government of the United Kingdom should promote harm-reducing practices within the WHO discussions and reduce barriers to access innovative products that are game-changers for smoke-free policies. Any measures that COP9 will propose should recognize the data presented and consider the UK national experience. The United Kingdom, as a global leader in tobacco control, can ensure that regulatory measures are based on sufficient and convincing data.

This is the only case to implement realistic measures to each country that will be efficient. A general idea about the protection of public health is not enough. The reports to COP9 will likely continue to recommend that countries either ban new harm reduction products or regulate them strictly to discourage their use. An example of strict regulation is the Plain Packaging implemented for tobacco, which has been conclusively proven to have failed to have any impact upon smoking rates in any jurisdiction where it has been tried but has instead led to a boon in black market illicit tobacco smuggling by international criminal syndicates.

The policy positions presented by WHO should be based in realistic and accurate criteria about tobacco consumption and efficacy of harm reduction tobacco products. A procedure based in transparency and public consultation will contribute more to the goal of smoking reduction. Similarly, it is a fundamental principle of good government that decisions be made in an open, accountable, and transparent manner. Unfortunately, COP meetings operated behind closed doors, with no opportunity for journalists, scientists or non-profit watchdogs to observe or participate.

Furthermore, there is no public consultation between the release of the Secretariat report and the COP session. WHO should make transparency part of their policy. As most anti-tobacco policies and legislation ratified under the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control WHO FCTC aim to reduce smoking prevalence, the justification of COP proposals should be formed based on the smoking rate of each category adults, youth etc , the tobacco consumption and the success of the quit aid tools in each country.

Massive bans or brand removals are trade tactics oriented towards the market structure and not the protection of public health. Prohibition time and time again has been shown to fail. This is a more sensible system of regulation, which works with consumers to ensure better public health outcomes. It is noted that the UK government can further improve some aspects of its tobacco policy and the constraints health warnings and advertising ban imposed by the EU Tobacco Products Directive should be removed so as to ensure smokers have access to appropriate information regarding the health benefits of quitting smoking through vaping.

The tobacco control policies for adolescents and the unintended consequences of proposals. In the UK, the rate of minors using vape products has consistently been below 2 percent. The overall trend in tobacco use over time in both adults and children has been downwards since , when e-cigarette use became widespread among adult smokers and ex-smokers Adult smoking habits in the UK, A possible flavor taste ban is a policy measure hurting the public health and the UK Government should be aware of the unintended consequences of such measures.

Governmental policies should protect young people and at the same time provide a cessation aid for people attempting to quit smoking. In some countries such as Netherlands, the Government proposed banning flavors in electronic vaping products as well, a measure that failed to consider the public health benefit of a harm reduction tool.

Flavors must remain available through legal channels as a matter of consumer safety. Otherwise, the black-market will flourish while putting dangerous products in the hands of thousands of consumers. Banning vape flavors practically misinforms smokers about the relative risks of e-cigarettes and limits the usefulness of vaping.

Significantly more adults and youth may go back to smoking combustible tobacco. A US survey of young adults using both e-cigarettes and vaping products, indicated that a ban on e-liquid flavors would lead to increases in combustible cigarette use and simultaneously lead to reductions in e-cigarette use. As such, any proposals through the COP process to further restrict access to flavoured vaping products would without doubt lead to an increase in people smoking combustible cigarettes.

The evidence provided by this report shows the effect of harm reduction products such as e-cigarettes on the global decline in cigarette consumption per adult. This recommendation conflicts with the FCTC protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products that aimed at eliminating all forms of illicit trade in the tobacco environment. The banning of vaping products would lead the smokers to purchase their e-cigarettes from illicit markets or from jurisdictions where they are legal.

Public health may be damaged with a sharp rise in smuggling and sale of illegal e-cigarettes. Illicit trade of e-cigarettes is a mounting problem across the globe that hurts economies and also may be used to fund terrorist and similar criminal enterprises. Furthermore, it ignores the scientific evidence provided indicating the power of vaping products to increase quit rates more effectively or to modify behaviors associated with combustible cigarettes.

Despite the fact that the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control FCTC aims to reduce harmful tobacco consumption, there have only been a few attempts to empirically evaluate the impact of this international treaty. No internationally comparable data on tobacco consumption are available for analysis by quasi-experiment. The FCTC is not a good forum for encouraging new ideas.

There is a persistent problem with the WHO relying on poor evidence or the motivated reasoning of activists. The WHO Executive Board th session meeting February called for countries to ban or restrict the use of e-cigarettes and novel and emerging tobacco products. WHO should take a fresh look at the function of e-cigarettes as a harm reduction tool and accept the progress that the tobacco industry has made in developing products that are able to significantly reduce smoking.

Science should come first in every health issue or situation. The pandemic crisis confirmed this statement. Policies of WHO, including plain packaging and banning of vaping products, damage Intellectual Property Rights and innovation. States can protect public health without damaging private property right protections and security of innovation. Tobacco control should be a social, public health, and quality-of-life concern rather than a business and trade issue.

Intellectual Property Rights are significant for the innovative harm-reducing products. E-cigarettes became possible only due to strong intellectual property rights in a competitive open market. States can protect public health without compromising the protection of private property rights and market-driven innovation. The effective protection of intellectual and property rights is essential and can promote investment in the market. The rationale for the health function of banning vaping products contradicts the overwhelming evidence on e-cigarettes as the most successful quit aid.

It is a discriminatory measure for consumers, who are denied the access to products with reduced risk. It may support some fundamental rights including the right to health and a clean environment, but it unduly violates the right to liberty, property and equality. Practices like these, discourage investment and put businesses at risk of losing their competitive edge. Policies that undermine innovation often have unintended consequences, and Property Rights Alliance opposes all measures that have irreparable harm to intellectual property.

The initial intention of the COP process was to reduce tobacco dependency and the associated mortality caused by the smoking of conventional tobacco products. In actively opposing the opportunities presented by newer reduced-risk tobacco alternatives such as e-cigarettes, the World Health Organization is now actively working against its stated mission.

It is furthermore deeply troubling that independent scientific experts remain excluded from the COP9 process, and the complete lack of transparency and consultation violate every norm of sound public policy. As a result of the WHO pursing a policy agenda that is contrary to science, the UK faces significant threats that its successful harm reduction model may be undermined, and access to life-saving products may be restricted.

Thank you very much for considering our comments. Please feel free to contact us with any questions or comments. This would undo the bipartisan net operating loss NOL tax cut that has provided liquidity to American businesses that have seen significant losses during the pandemic. If Democrats have their way, small business owners below this threshold including restaurant owners and retailers could see a retroactive tax increase.

American businesses, including small and medium sized companies, have seen unprecedented challenges due to the Coronavirus pandemic. However, many businesses regardless of size have struggled with a decline in revenues and additional expenses from implementing new technologies for remote work and retrofitting existing workspaces.

Lawmakers should not be clawing back relief for taxpayers after the fact based on the view that these taxpayers are not worthy of assistance. It also expanded the ability of businesses organized as passthrough entities to use NOLs to offset against non-business income. First, Democrats want to prevent businesses from carrying back losses before This would mean losses could not be carried back at all, losses could be carried back just one year to and losses could be carried back just two years and The CARES Act provision allowing passthroughs to offset business losses against non-business income would also be suspended.

This restriction is triggered if the total amount of dividends and repurchased shares since exceeds 5 percent of the value of the stock in the last day of any taxable year. Finally, the bill denies carrybacks if a company triggers section m or g of the tax code — provisions that limit the ability of businesses to deduct compensation payments to executives.

Net operating loss carrybacks are not a handout to big businesses or specific industries. NOLs are also not a bailout. Businesses are already able to deduct operating losses under the tax code in the year the losses are incurred and can carryforward losses indefinitely to future years. As a result, net operating loss carrybacks largely change the timing of taxes paid. There is nothing controversial about expanding net operating loss carrybacks during an economic downturn. Variants of this proposal have been enacted into law repeatedly over the past 20 years on a bipartisan basis and signed into law by Republican and Democrat presidents.

For instance:. Business losses incurred in or can now be used to recoup taxes paid in the prior five years. Photo Credit: Geoff Livingston. In a letter to the New Hampshire General Court, Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform, called upon lawmakers to provide much-needed tax relief to individuals, families, and businesses across the Granite State.

In , the Republican-controlled General Court and Gov. But when Democrats won control of the General Court in , they made this promised tax relief contingent upon revenues coming in above a certain threshold. Due to the COVID pandemic, that threshold was unfortunately not met and now those tax cuts are being taken away at a time when they are needed most.

As such, reducing the BPT and the BET would be a huge win for all Granite Staters, as it would allow businesses to have more money to invest in jobs, wages, and other business operations, and may even result in lower costs for consumers. And, as more and more states are added to the no income tax list, the more the asterisk by New Hampshire will become a problem. Providing much-needed tax relief would be a great way to accomplish this goal, while also attracting new investment, jobs, and opportunities to the Granite State.

In , the Republican-controlled General Court delivered legislation that provided much-needed tax relief to businesses and employees by reducing the Business Profits Tax and the Business Enterprise Tax. In , they continued on this pro-growth path, scheduling additional reductions to the BPT and BET rates for and But after winning control of the state House and Senate in November , Democrats used their first budget to block the rate cuts from taking effect by making them contingent upon state revenues coming in above a certain threshold.

Due to the pandemic, that trigger was not met, and now businesses across the state are being robbed of tax relief at a time when they need it most. Lawmakers should use the legislative session to undo these Democrat tax hikes. Business taxes — which are paid by people — result in lower wages, fewer jobs, and higher prices for consumers.

Lawmakers should use the legislative session to reduce the meals and room tax. In addition to helping these struggling businesses, this tax relief would be a win for all Granite Staters, as it would reduce the overall cost of purchasing food at restaurants and staying overnight in hotels, cabins, and other lodging facilities.

New Hampshire is the only state that appears on the no income tax list with an asterisk by its name due its tax on interest and dividends income. As more and more people and jobs continue to move into no income tax states, more and more states are looking to phase out their income taxes.

The source of interest and dividends are corporate profits, which are already taxed at the entity level. This is a practice that economists and tax policy agree should not exist in an optimal tax climate. I thank you for your public service.

ATR encourages you to provide much-needed tax relief to individual taxpayers, families, employees, and businesses across the Granite State during the legislative session. In a victory for evidence and common sense, the New Hampshire Senate Commerce Committee yesterday voted to dismiss SB 62, legislation that would have banned flavored reduced risk tobacco alternatives such as e-cigarettes. Testimony presented to the committee demonstrated how, if enacted, SB 62 would have had a disastrous impact on businesses and public health throughout the Granite State, leading to widespread layoffs and business closures, as well as a clear increase in tobacco-related mortality.

It is becoming all too common for legislators to ignore science and data, and impose bans and regulations with disastrous consequences. Minnesota Governor Tim Walz introduced his budget proposal last week, a plan that is dominated by big tax hikes. Walz seems to think the government gave successful people their earnings, saying, "This is about a progressive taxation system that says, much is required of much given to some folks. Also standing out amongst a mess of bad tax policy is a tax hike on life-saving e-cigarettes.

Republican lawmakers and Minnesota businesses voiced opposition while Democrats, teachers, and labor unions praised the budget's proposed provisions. GOP leaders stated that they would not approve a plan that included tax increases and that the state should cut state various agency budgets and dip into budget reserves instead of raising taxes.

We are ready to roll up our sleeves to pass a bipartisan budget that funds our priorities while asking the government to tighten its belt to close the budget deficit without tax increases.

BASEBALL SYSTEMS FOR BETTING

Record deficits, oil shocks, the continuing swamp of Iraq, another quarter of rising inflation and shrinking average incomes, job losses, and a complete and utter lack of respect for the United States around the world. However, until we live in a world where women are no longer raped, it must remain.

For now, we should focus on decreasing the number of abortions, rather than using the issue as a wedge to divide people and distract us from the real business of rehabilitating our economy, transforming our energy policy, extracting our military from an endless conflict, and taking care of the people who have ALREADY been born, and are suffering as we speak. He has no regard for human life. If the abortion does not kill the baby, just stick a fork in its head and kill it. Check out his voting record.

I could not morally support this person. The evangelicals demand the right to express and maintain their beliefs. How far away are they really from other world religions who preach that political behavior must match their theocratic tenants? President Elect McCain was definitely the winner tonight! Many have said that they thought he had the questions ahead of time because of his quick, seemingly well prepared answers!

Wrong — that was the mind of an experienced, knowledgeable and up-to-date leader ready to take over the position of President of the United States. So much for the young, inexperienced — Prompter Reading — Flim Flam Obamaman — he is not ready nor will he ever be with his list of anti-American friends and associates. Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama side-stepped a pointed query about […].

Did he think that kind of too-clever-by-half smarmy answer would get him past such an important issue? And if you are really concerned about the disadvantaged, can there be a more disadvantaged class than babies in danger of being deprived of their life without due process? You have to be kidding. I guess his masters over at pro choice and NOW will be happy but everyone else will see it as politics as usual. What other issues are above his pay grade.

I guess any issue where he does not want to alienate his core base. Maybe you should have watched the show. If it had been a different audience, he would have given a different answer. John McCain won the night handsdown! He showed he is a man of conviction. His answers were straight forward while Obama danced around the questions and left you unsure of just where he stood.

Yep, Barry is not qualified to be a President yet. So of course we should all stop thinking and vote for this man. Obama voted to let live babies die if they were born alive following an abortion that failed. Those who devalue life at the beginning, will devalue life at any age. I remember clearly being pro-life when I was a fetus. What a joke liberals are! That way you will not have to kill your unwanted baby son or baby daughter, who incidentally, only want you to love them and let them exist, if but for a brief moment in time.

This is a defining moment for both of these men. Kudos to Rick for asking the right question personhood There appear to be a lot of issues where the thoughtful resolution is above Sen. Trade policy, tax policy, international relations and virtually every religion-oriented question seem beyond his level of understanding. And they belive this because they can see human life beginning at conception under a microscope.

How vile that Barack Hussein Obama would lie to that crowd and the entire TV and radio audience like that! Obama is a typical Chicago politician. If Obama cannot tell us when he begins life begins—he is not ready-nor will he ever be ready to be a leader—he is only a showman.

Coupled with his position that he actively opposed legislative attempts to provide comfort to babies who survived abortions. Moreover, he basically called America a selfish nation. We are the most-giving nation in the history of this planet. Whenever there is a disaster, America is there to give, give and give. We, the citizens, give more money to charitable causes per capita than any other citizens of any nation on this earth.

The poverty of the world is caused by ruthless dictators who want to control how we think, how we live, how we think, how we worwhip, what type of work we should do, and what we should eat…. These dictators.. Chavez, Castro, Putin, the Imams of the world, and the ilk are socialist and worse who are only concerned about staying in control and punishing their enemies. America is strong and the becon of freedom for the oppressed. It offers more opportunity than any nation in the history of the planet.

We are free because Freedom is the core of all humam progress. If Mr. B Hussein Obama is not of the pay grade to make a judgement on Life or death in babies, then how can he consistently vote FOR abortion both first second third term abortion and Late term abortion.

Amazing that his followers will buy into his side stepped remark about abortion but then again is that not how he is running his campaign. Evade Evade Evade the questions and give round about answers. We reached the conclusion that the nicest thing that can be said about JM is that he sucks slightly less than BHO. I never thought it would come down to these two. The good news is that we survived LBJ and the Clintons, hopefully we can ride out either of these 15 watt bulbs.

If he made more millions in sweetheart deals, could he answer that? No, no and hell, no. BO stinks. His level of experience and lack of maturity indicate poor, if any, leadership qualities. On the other hand, McCain, is also in the special interest pockets.

He abstained from the Medicare votes in June and July. His waffling and avoidance of addressing another hard issue are also indictments against him. I honor his service and suffering at the hands of communists in Hanoi, BUT that does not make him presidential material, either. The USA is in trouble no matter who wins. We are getting partisan politicians, not real leaders for the most important job in the world.

God help us all. It is ironic that my antispam work is life. When will we stop the holocaust against the unborn? When will we be brave enough to say that these are not blobs but humans that only need time to develop to full maturity. Above your pay grade? That kind of weakness will not be rewarded with votes. Both candidates displayed themselves well. Obama was very thoughtful and McCain outperformed expectations. Oh My! What a craven response to a critical question.

To make light of such a life and death issue, shows how Obama is unfit to collect a presidential pay-rate…. How can Obama claim to be a Christian or anyone claiming to be a Christian vote for Obama? Whether you believe that life begins at conception or later, Obama has done everything in his power to push for Partial-birth abortion and even supporting measures to allow a newborn who survived Partial-birth abortion to die.

You can call yourself a Christian but you are not a Christian if you support this barbaric, evil procedure or support anyone who does. He is running for the President of the United States of America! How much higher of a pay grade do you want?

Once again, Obama fails to give a direct answer to a direct question. Also, he lacks the honesty to repeat his true ideas if it is in conflict with his audience. I thought Obama did an excellent job at the forum!

Obama is very thoughtful and intelligent! Obama showed his christianity unlike McCain who tried to be a jokster, story teller and duck and dodge some issues! McCain was cleary pandering! Obama was much more sincere! A person who never answers questions directly either cannot make up his mind or is trying to hide who he is and what he really thinks. Obama has voted against legislation that protects the infant of a botched abortion if it born alive. Above his pay-grade? Does he not have an opinion on one of the most divisive subjsects in morality and poltics?

Or, is he not willing to give his opinion in public for political reasons, and what kind of man would either question make him? If the issue is above his paygrade perhaps Barack is applying for the wrong job. What a wuss and cop-out answer. The slippery messiah yet again avoids answering directly, choosing instead to speak in parables that only his fellow Marxists will understand.

For Obama, who has never served in the Armed Forces, to use an expression that is widely used by those who have is ridiculous. To the actual question he was asked, the answer he should have given if he was HONEST in reflecting his evil views should have been after birth. He could have went on to elaborate that, this is of course exclusive of a baby that was born alive after a botched abortion, which as we all know Obama believes is a non-person that can be left to die.

The truth, as another pseudo-scientific media outlet used to say, is out there—and, as it turns out, science supports those conservative evangelicals. Watched both Obama and McCain and the follow up reporters. We will include a McCain sticker on the sign. Thanks Rick Warren. His answer makes for a nice soundbite, but so do most of his canned responses. By that reasoning all invalids should just be left to fend for themselves.

McCain was the clear winner of the debate at Saddleback Church. He was precise, honest and assertive in giving his answers to questions of great importance to the American people. He is not ready to be President of the United States. And what job is it he wants again?

Maybe this is a case where we can tell where he stands by his actions. While in the Illinois State Senate, he took to the floor to vote opposition to a bill which would mandate treatment for infants surviving their own abortion.

It is unbelievable to me that anyone would vote for this man. I guess his pay grade vassilates according to his voting block. Abortion is not birth control, it is murder. I had to prevent pregnancy if I wanted to have sex without conception and so do all other women. I repeat, Abortion is not birth control. In this day, no women gets pregnant unless she chooses. If the procedure is no different from, say, the removal of an unwanted mole—which is essentially what the argument for legalization is—then why expend resources to reduce its frequency?

God will not let the guilty go unpunished. He forgives but this nation will continue to pay the price. Where is the party of Harry Truman? Above his paygrade??? Surely no question is above his paygrade. As I recall, during the primary campaign McAmnesty was asked by a reporter what he would do if his daughter was raped and became pregnant.

He said they would seriously discuss having an abortion! Now he tells the evangelicals something completely different. The Delusional Right! Kill , Iraqis, 3. But Abortion…oh my god…what a heinous crime. One nation under surveillance with urine tests and wire taps for all. God Bless America…and all the used car salesmen evangelists…what a joke. What did Jesus call us to do? He called us to be like him to look at his world as he would, to serve others as a higher calling than the Torah or law.

When presented His earth on the day of judgement, how might Jesus respond to our stewardship? How might he respond to an abortion clinic? Obama and Gov. Do not let your logic be disuaded by your hatred of money or capitalism. There is bad in all these things but there is good as well if used properly.

I cannot find any positive attribute to abortion which as I understand it, kills tens of thousands of babies each year. Use your own gift of logic from there. Obama with out his teleprompters or 30 minute polished speeches showed to be a junior senator who need another 10 years of seasoning. McCain was on point and you know were he stands. We need more of these debates and great job getting away from the usual boring questions you hear every election year asked by the same lame so called journalist rooting for the liberal.

Obama tap-dances while McCain is straight to the point. When life begins is a religious question. Its a question that is answered in the privacy of people, their families and communities. The politicians pushing this issue have their hands in our pockets while trying to keep your eyes up our skirts. The politicians pushing this issue have their hands in your pocket while trying to keep your eyes up our skirts.

Barack could not say that life begins at conception-if he did how could he jusify the destrucion of a human life. Even if Barack believes life begins at conception-he will not publicley say so. Is all one has to do is look at his voting record on the issue of abortion to know what he is all about. Considering the dude has barely held a job for any substantial period of time other than signing up welfare recipients to vote Democratic there is very little that he is qualified to answer.

So Obama cannot bring himself to say a baby even partially out of the birth canal has no human rights. Forgive me for being a one position voter but this tells me all I need to know about Obama. Golly ,McCain sounds so wholesome one has the tendency to forget he voted to confirm Ginsberg,an official of the pro-abortin ACLU for the supremes.

Get the press out of the picture and let a common sense pastor take over and WOW you really get to see who these candidates running for president are. This turned out to be a great forum. I am pro-choice but after hearing 40 million abortions have taken place since Roe V Wade does make me think twice. As Pastor Warren stated this would be considered a Holocaust.

Also, double checked and Obama stated under the Bush admin abortions are up. He is wrong and should check his responses before stated non fact. Abortions are down under this administration. Please if speaking deliver true facts, candidates. This is just a clever use of a phrase to appease the intended audience — without saying what you mean. He was honest, and said what they thought they wanted to hear.

Give me a break! A pathetic respone by BO but the best he could do given his radical voting record, i. Worse, if the child manages to survive the attempted murder, err abortion, then BO supports letting the baby die of neglect. It was not so long ago that someone with these radical views would be shunned and treated as a moral leper. The end is near. Obama does not want to state his known position on abortion. He may be trying to win over evangelicals but he surely will not change his pro abortion stance at the risk of infuriating his liberal base.

Why he even voted in support of killing babies that were born despite an attempted abortion! He talks about helping the disadvantaged. Who is more helpless than a child left to die? Despite that admission, Obama has consistently promoted the wanton destruction of innocent babies; including the Illinois case where he sued to kill child after it survived a failed abortion attempt.

I actually looked at this idea ahead of time…. McCain seemed to be rushing, especially in the first quarter of it, to get out his answers he had rehearsed. Thought this the best format ever to gain a perspective on each man. Knew Obama would be eloquent and feared for McCain in that regard. Fears put to rest! Go McCain! I trust McCain completly with our country. Now, I can relax. Abortion is NOT a Contitutional government issue.

You saw me before I was born and scheduled each day of my life before I began to breathe. Every day was recorded in your Book. By aborting more innocent lives? Sex outside of marriage, abortion, letting a little baby die outside the womb because of a botched abortion brings misery and suffering to all. The question was direct, the answer shows intellectual arrogance. His pay grade is the top pay grade for leading the free world.

What an idiot!! What always frustrates me is that such answers do not invite the logical follow-up question. The abortion debate is probably the most emotional and divisive one in American politics. There are several issues, of course, that invite debate. At what point is a human being a human being? Most pro-lifers adamantly declare conception to be the answer. Regardless of whether one agrees with their resultant opinions, they are at least consistent.

Some most? Again, agree or not, the resultant opinions from this view are logically consistent. But I would immediately ask him this question: How then can you advocate abortion? In his case, how can he possibly defend late-term and partial-birth abortion if by his own admission it could be the killing of a viable human worthy of the right to life?

I originally saw myself as pro-choice. I fully recognize that the beginning human life and rights can be defined somewhere other than at the two extremes usually put forth in the debate. I realized, however, that because I could not define that point scientifically or morally I also could not advocate killing a fetus. The debate gets mired in euphemisms on both sides, and we lose sight sometimes of what we are debating. Abortion is most definitely the killing of something.

If one can honestly believe that a fetus, any fetus, is NOT a human being then a pro-choice stance is defensible. Both of these men are fence sitters. You can not be a Believer and be pro-choice, approve of same-sex marriage, or be ashamed to openly talk about your faith. Above his pay grade! All political questions are above his pay grade. He wants the highest office in the world. I hope he can answer the tough questions. I want to see his resume!!!

Being a lawyer does not qualify in being a leader. Dems should mute the speches and look to see what he did for Chicago. People should look at his associates. You are what you do, not what you say, and you are who you hang out with. Obama did his usual dancing around the questions, trying to evade a direct answer. John McCain was forth-coming with all of his answers. We certainly know where McCain stands on all of the issues, but we are still in the dark about Obama.

He wants the American people to know him, then he needs to answers the questions asked of him. He either did the politicians dance or he avoided any answer. What on earth did that mean??? I think the American people should watch out for the Change Obama will be bringing.

Ye be warned…what a Clintonesque answer given by a man who claims to be a Christian…. Slavery was allowed because some were thought to be less than others. Pro life gives us all hope. This has been the on going problem with Obama. No precise answers and this comment speaks volumes. I do not think the man knows himself as a person just his ambition to be President. I thought the forum in which this debate was done was one of the best I have ever seen. If Obama is for abortion on demand in all cases which is his official stand , why try to soft peddle it?

Give me a break, the unborn are the single most defensless group in the world. I love it how the media trys to paint him as a centrist; but he is as far left as you can be. Hussein Obama is the least qualified candidate for President in recent history, and his response to this simple question is illustrative. If you wish to defer to experts on matters of quantum physics, macro-economics, or ancient asian literature — fine.

Second trimester? Third trimester? Six months? First birthday? Come on, Barack! It was a flippant answer to a serious question. The office of President of the United States is probably beyond his pay grade as well. He has voted numerous times for the right to kill babies that have survived abortion. He has voted to support partial birth abortion. This man has no respect for life, at least when it comes to a baby, the one type of citizen and human that is completely dependent on adults for survival.

Anyone who believes that they are a Christian and votes for Obama is simply deluded. Obama is the most pro abortion candidate the Democrats could run. In the past he has supported even partial birth abortions which are in fact infanticide. The thinking of some so called Christians is so foggy it makes me sometimes doubt the wisdom of letting them vote at all. This guy continues to demonstrate that he has no theology and philosphy he is not willing to openly reveal to the American people.

He is a trojan horse whether he knows it or not. He is the wrong person to be the President of the United States. Before you vote for him…please listen carefully to what he says and review his record. My grandson Tyler is depending on it. Above his pay grade simply means only God knows the answer.

The Bible is curiouly silent on abortion per se. That said, abortion is clearly not an ideal birth control. John McCain is obsessed with war. If where were no war I think he would create one- just to be in battle. I dont trust him to run this country. People are laughing at his threats to Russia. Other countries are laughing at us. We have lost our credibility. China is calling the shots because of the massive loans….

Good job, John! Finally some Straight Talk Express right when we genuine social and fiscal conservatives need to see it! Not a meaningful change at all. Abortion remains the ultimate child abuse, and candidates that support child abuse are disqualified regardless of their position on other issues. However last night, I was immensely impressed with his performance and his quick and comfortable answers to the questions.

He was very good. What a coward; Obama should be proud of who he is and stand by his record of absolutely no limits on abortions at any stage, including after it is botched and the baby has a premature live birth If you cannot stand up for your own record then you are a no good politician… just like nearly all the other ones in the US Senate. Obama is little more than the results of Marketing. Obama simply avoided stating his position. But his record on the right to life is perfectly clear: the state determines who has the right to life.

With this as a premise, what good are any other human rights? Above his pay grade?! This guy is a scumbag supreme. McCain is not anti-abortion. He just wants to have sufficent future co-signers for his increased national debt. Were were they when they said it? What are the exact quotes? Or were none willing to go on record?

And why? He disgusts me. If answering the question on when life begins is above his pay grade, then maybe being President is above his pay grade. Does that mean if we pay him more money he will decide how moral he is? I can read your opinion between the lines, but still we need to be more forthright in our positions.

It is above his spiritual awarness. To him pregnancy is a sexually transmitted disease. Even when the goop comes out kicking and screaming it is still just goop. Young couples on the T. Heck, they will be glad to even share it with you. Sex is the golden bull in Ameica. Advice to all: Instrumental worship is pure human vanity and is wholly inappropriate in the assembly.

Put down your guitar, turn off your amplifier… And get on your knees. Answering a question about abortion is above his pay grade…. Not with my vote! First, Obama backed out of the townhall debates—except one on July 4th when no one would be watching. After last night, Obama may try go into a complete four-corners stall and back out of the debates.

Sorry, libs, but your guy is going into his convention limping. Without even facing McCain head-to-head, he got manhandled. I think even Warren started turning on him and began enabling McCain by the end because he saw his book sales plunging if he were perceived as backing a candidate as loathsome as Obama. But we all know what happened. Spin on, libs.

I think the considerable number of fencesitters saw in spades their choice—and their choice has to be McCain. Above his pay grade, what a fool. What excuse will he use then? Obama may be eligible to run for president but he is not qualified to be president. Great job- John McCain. You had it all going in your faver. I hope the liberals can see what a fool OB made made of himself last night.

Take a stand Obama. Be a leader. What else is above his paygrade? The economy? Take a look folks. Organizing communinty events in Chicago and days as US Senator is not enough experience to lead our country in the most difficult time our country has experienced.

Throughout the campaign, Obama has shown he is helpless without the teleprompter. The great orator is only that! He voted in Illinois that even an aborted baby that lives has no right to life. Most people would not consider throwing a puppy in the river, but Obama would throw a newborn baby that survived an abortion in the river!

You cannot call yourself a Christian and vote for this men! This man is not ready for prime time!!!!! Senator Obama!!!! Why is it so hard to stand up for what is right? It is wrong to abort babies, it is wrong to kill an innocent person.

We only destroy our society by allowing abortion to continue. How many houses could have been bought or cars bought if we had allowed those babies to live, or what if we have killed the person who would have cured cancer. We must elect those who are willing to preserve life and not be manbe pambe about their position.

Must be this doubt just reciently sprang up since he voted twice against bills REQUIRING doctors, nurses and er staff to provide life-saving help to a baby born alive after an unsuccessful late term induced abortion. What a great guy! How about the fact that he is running for President of the United States? What other answers are above his pay grade, and what about more complicated decisions that come with the presedency?

Are we going to hear that those answers, too, are above his pay grade? Whatever your position on […]. Obama is pro-abortion, and now demonstrates himself to be a coward and not admit it. Because he knows most of the country now knows what abortion really is — murder of innocent children.

The most important issue in this campaign and in the United States right now, whether people realizes it or not, is the question of the protecting the rights of the marginalized, defenseless, voiceless sector of our society, which is the unborn. How can that not be the most important issue in the U.

And we have Obama, who thinks that killing babies is a right that should be protected. Talk about calling evil as good…and good as evil. At least McCain remains true to his anti-abortion convictions. Obama is again playing the politician- he has supported termination of life even if a fetus is born alive hence, a baby. White-haired-wrinkly-guy seemed emotionally unstable at times, especially when the talk turned to issues of war.

His answers were terse and angry- not thoughtful. And there was no sense of thoughtful kindness or caring about him. He was jumpy and had a harshness about him that he tried to cover up with jokes and laughing. My father was a prisoner of war. The emotional scars last a lifetime and sometimes erupt in violence.

McCain is scary. Obama looked like a sleeze with his smirk and cool demeaner. His body language showed that most things he was saying was made up as he went and to me that says he was trying to say things to make who he was talking to happy. I found that to be a ridiculously horrible answer that demonstrated to me that Mr. Obama is a candidate who is afraid of making a stand on a very legitimate issue because of which voting block he might offend.

I am very disappointed in how Mr. Obama answered this question and it has me now seriously questioning whether or not I can support him. A president must not only be willing to take tough stands and make tough decisions, he must understand that sometimes his decisions, and abortion is certainly one of them, have to be steered by his own moral compass and not by the ramifications those decisions have on his popularity.

By avoiding the question in this way Mr. Obama showed he either has not developed his own set of convictions on this issue or even worse, he is not willing to stand behind them. So a woman gets post-partum depression from giving birth, what does she get from an abortion.

Weasel is as weasel does. How would you know Mr days of Senate experience? To hell with these worthless, aimless, characters! I refuse to vote for either one of them! Rather he is the only one for leadership and an administration with vision. The democrats view him with considerable disdain. They view anyone with fresh thinking as an idealogue. That is simple to understand when you consider that democrats have no fresh ideas of their own. John McCain is a good man.

But the problem is that he is lacking in vision and leadership qualities. He alwsays pursues a strategy rather than a vision of his own. After all he has the most anti-life record in the senate, and that is saying a lot. His statement at the beginning about how we treat the least among us referring to the poor was such an obvious opening for Rick to ask about his voting to keep from giving medical care for babies who survived an abortion.

How cruel can you get? And he is for the poor? I admire any man who stands up for the unborn, and of course their mothers who are usually forced or co-erced into abortion. I am praing for McCain, especiall concerning the Supreme Court. The question was not about whether or not Obama was smart enough to answer it but whether or not he was wise and compassionate enough to wrestle with a very human problem.

What a weasley and cowardly answer. At its best it was completely cerebral without any thought for the child at all, only about protecting himself. My God, what a self-centered idiot. So Obama is willing to allow murder in his ignorance? How stupid can you get Obama? Above your pay grade??? I am confused. He is not going to tell us until we elect him president?

Why would he duck that question! Otherwise, birth control would be just wrong. However, when life begins, thats a whole nuther ballgame. What a difference! Obama was all about style and equivocating gibberish. McCain was all about blunt substance, experience and facts. What a wishy washy non-answer from Obama.

No kidding its ethical and moral but where does he specifically stand? When he is President, will his pay scale be high enough to give an honest answer to the full term, born alive question? Obama is a weasel, he is the most pro-abortion Senator in the Senate, he even voted against the rights of a child who survives a partial-birth abortion, he is trying to have it both ways and should not be able to get away with it. His radical pro-abortion views deserve no support from people of faith and his unwillingness to come clean about his views exhibit his untrustworthiness.

A boxer who likes to bob and weave,,, and another came to fight…you guess which is which. He could have opted out for adoption and gotten more votes. Saying that it is up to God to decide is a cop out. What a cowardly answer from Obama. Man or monster? You decide. NObama knows when life begins, knows that a woman has a right to choose. Barry Houssain Obama is a phoney and an empty suit. He has a look in his eyes like he has sold his soul and is on a runaway train with no control. Most people would be in favor of saving the life of a baby born alive after an abortion.

Obama voted against a bill that would save a baby born alive after an abortion which answers the question about when Obama would afford human rights to an unborn baby. Answer: never, making Obama an extremist when it comes to being pro abortion and out of sync with the majority of Americans, I would say even the world.

I would go so far to say that most Americans do not want someone in the White House who appears to be in favor of infanticide. The fact that Obama will not vote for three different bills that prevent babies from dying of neglect after failed abortions tells me all I need to know about this monster.

This is incredible! So when is it, Obama? It seems that the people above his pay grade here are Planned Parenthood, who he answers to on this issue. If he ran his campaign on his true left wing radical liberal beliefs he would have no chance. John McCain gave a perfect performance last night. If you vote for The Chosen One, you will derserve everything you get. Unfortunately, so will all Americans. Everytime I start to warm up to him, he does, or publicly considers doing something to turn away the base.

The latest? Trouble with Russia? Solving problems with radical Muslims? Too much govt waste? His qualifications are almost minimum wage. Hey Obama, nothing like avoiding the question! I was most interesting to watch the eye contact,or lack thereof as well as the general body language.

Who do you think you would do business on a handshake with? I watched the entire show. Felt J. How about visualizing the heartbeat at 6 weeks after conception. Nurse Stanek was fired from her job for going to the head of the hospital about it.

He then accused the nurse of wanting to do away with Roe v. What a jerk! And you want this creep to be our President?! If Obama is going to push his view and back legislation in relation to abortion, he should have an answer to that question that he can explain in a thoughtful manner.

If Obama believes that abortion is above his pay grade he is unfit to serve as President. As President he would have to enforce our rights under the Constitution. The primary right of all being Life. If a President is unwilling to obey that, he would be willing to disregard every other right we have.

Every President since Roe has failed in their duty to protect the lives of the innocent babies that have been denied their fundamental right. Roe is a court opinion, not law. Courts do not make law, take the time to read the Federalists Papers and you will discover this lost principle. The President has a Constitutional duty to ignore an illegal court opinion. Life does begin at conception, which makes abortion wrong. If Obama was a true Christian he would realize this.

Jesus kept them separate, He did not combine the two. So, a Christian can not except abortion as Obama does. Obama is a showman and the picture of a politician. He knows that his stance on abortion is extraordinarily distasteful to many Americans he supports partial-birth abortions. I believe life begins at conception. If you support partial-birth abortions, life begins immediately after birth. Still simple. Simply barbaric. That is to say, only God can say when life begins.

Besides, evangelicals ought to start respecting the sanctomy of life of all the innocent Iraqi people who have been murdered by the American government. Judging from the sexist campaign that the Obama machine ran against Clinton in the primaries, I would say that the US Presidency is above his pay grade as well. Hussein proved to be the slick political hack he really is. On most questions he did the rope a dope coming down on both sides of the issues and avoiding specific answers.

The best example of this was the question on when do you believe life begins. Anyway, take the teleprompter and the expertely written speach away from Hussein and he is just a double talking hack and empty suite novice! So Obama wants to be president? Or should we judge him now on his unwillingness to answer questions?

What an Empty Suit. Whether your pro-life or pro-abortion rights, this fool should at least be required to answer question. How arrogant it that? Over and over Obama has shown his arrogance. Kudos for McCain. If there is any question who should be President, look at the way they answer the question.

Obama supports late term abortions vehemently, but dances around the issue when dealing with people of faith. McCaim sticks to his position. We are tired of having the last two Presidents who lied all the time. You are applying to be the leader of the free world. You are it! This man is without a soul. He needs someone to tell him when life begins? He is also a coward, fearful to stand on principle for anything.

I take that back, he is not afraid to take a stand against the voiceless and the powerless. Absolutely, Mr Obama was certainly out of his depth and probably far below his pay-grade. He is used to speaking with a teleprompter and a mike in his ear.

I wonder what other issues, that are important to the American people, are above his paygrade. Is the Presidency above his paygrade as well? He did not side step the question, he told the truth. Eternally above his pay grade. I am a mother of four high risk pregnancies. And each time I have to come to terms with the fact that the life inside me does not belong to me, but to God only.

Barak Obama knows that an unborn child is in the balance between heaven and earth… this is an issue that involves God, mother, and child — Not some mere man. This is the stuff of Personal Spiritual Warfare and the government cannot go there — not even if they try. It is a profound loss. But so is an abused and neglected unwanted child. So is an orphan trapped in a system that is incapable of true love.

So are parents who are lost under a burden they cannot bear. So is a world with an all but forgotten population of orphans. And we all no that a president cannot make abortion just go away, legal or not. Only God can do that. If Democrats have their way, small business owners below this threshold including restaurant owners and retailers could see a retroactive tax increase.

American businesses, including small and medium sized companies, have seen unprecedented challenges due to the Coronavirus pandemic. However, many businesses regardless of size have struggled with a decline in revenues and additional expenses from implementing new technologies for remote work and retrofitting existing workspaces.

Lawmakers should not be clawing back relief for taxpayers after the fact based on the view that these taxpayers are not worthy of assistance. It also expanded the ability of businesses organized as passthrough entities to use NOLs to offset against non-business income. First, Democrats want to prevent businesses from carrying back losses before This would mean losses could not be carried back at all, losses could be carried back just one year to and losses could be carried back just two years and The CARES Act provision allowing passthroughs to offset business losses against non-business income would also be suspended.

This restriction is triggered if the total amount of dividends and repurchased shares since exceeds 5 percent of the value of the stock in the last day of any taxable year. Finally, the bill denies carrybacks if a company triggers section m or g of the tax code — provisions that limit the ability of businesses to deduct compensation payments to executives.

Net operating loss carrybacks are not a handout to big businesses or specific industries. NOLs are also not a bailout. Businesses are already able to deduct operating losses under the tax code in the year the losses are incurred and can carryforward losses indefinitely to future years. As a result, net operating loss carrybacks largely change the timing of taxes paid. There is nothing controversial about expanding net operating loss carrybacks during an economic downturn.

Variants of this proposal have been enacted into law repeatedly over the past 20 years on a bipartisan basis and signed into law by Republican and Democrat presidents. For instance:. Business losses incurred in or can now be used to recoup taxes paid in the prior five years. Photo Credit: Geoff Livingston. In a letter to the New Hampshire General Court, Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform, called upon lawmakers to provide much-needed tax relief to individuals, families, and businesses across the Granite State.

In , the Republican-controlled General Court and Gov. But when Democrats won control of the General Court in , they made this promised tax relief contingent upon revenues coming in above a certain threshold. Due to the COVID pandemic, that threshold was unfortunately not met and now those tax cuts are being taken away at a time when they are needed most.

As such, reducing the BPT and the BET would be a huge win for all Granite Staters, as it would allow businesses to have more money to invest in jobs, wages, and other business operations, and may even result in lower costs for consumers. And, as more and more states are added to the no income tax list, the more the asterisk by New Hampshire will become a problem.

Providing much-needed tax relief would be a great way to accomplish this goal, while also attracting new investment, jobs, and opportunities to the Granite State. In , the Republican-controlled General Court delivered legislation that provided much-needed tax relief to businesses and employees by reducing the Business Profits Tax and the Business Enterprise Tax.

In , they continued on this pro-growth path, scheduling additional reductions to the BPT and BET rates for and But after winning control of the state House and Senate in November , Democrats used their first budget to block the rate cuts from taking effect by making them contingent upon state revenues coming in above a certain threshold.

Due to the pandemic, that trigger was not met, and now businesses across the state are being robbed of tax relief at a time when they need it most. Lawmakers should use the legislative session to undo these Democrat tax hikes.

Business taxes — which are paid by people — result in lower wages, fewer jobs, and higher prices for consumers. Lawmakers should use the legislative session to reduce the meals and room tax. In addition to helping these struggling businesses, this tax relief would be a win for all Granite Staters, as it would reduce the overall cost of purchasing food at restaurants and staying overnight in hotels, cabins, and other lodging facilities.

New Hampshire is the only state that appears on the no income tax list with an asterisk by its name due its tax on interest and dividends income. As more and more people and jobs continue to move into no income tax states, more and more states are looking to phase out their income taxes.

The source of interest and dividends are corporate profits, which are already taxed at the entity level. This is a practice that economists and tax policy agree should not exist in an optimal tax climate. I thank you for your public service. ATR encourages you to provide much-needed tax relief to individual taxpayers, families, employees, and businesses across the Granite State during the legislative session.

In a victory for evidence and common sense, the New Hampshire Senate Commerce Committee yesterday voted to dismiss SB 62, legislation that would have banned flavored reduced risk tobacco alternatives such as e-cigarettes. Testimony presented to the committee demonstrated how, if enacted, SB 62 would have had a disastrous impact on businesses and public health throughout the Granite State, leading to widespread layoffs and business closures, as well as a clear increase in tobacco-related mortality.

It is becoming all too common for legislators to ignore science and data, and impose bans and regulations with disastrous consequences. Minnesota Governor Tim Walz introduced his budget proposal last week, a plan that is dominated by big tax hikes. Walz seems to think the government gave successful people their earnings, saying, "This is about a progressive taxation system that says, much is required of much given to some folks. Also standing out amongst a mess of bad tax policy is a tax hike on life-saving e-cigarettes.

Republican lawmakers and Minnesota businesses voiced opposition while Democrats, teachers, and labor unions praised the budget's proposed provisions. GOP leaders stated that they would not approve a plan that included tax increases and that the state should cut state various agency budgets and dip into budget reserves instead of raising taxes. We are ready to roll up our sleeves to pass a bipartisan budget that funds our priorities while asking the government to tighten its belt to close the budget deficit without tax increases.

It is not in the interest of anyone to impose new taxes and fees. States will prolong their economic recovery if their only course of action is to raise taxes despite the unsteady financial health of their small businesses, families, and students. This pick by President Joe Biden flies in the face of his call for unity and framing as a "moderate.

If one of these sugary drink taxes were imposed, it could result in a 55 to 67 cent tax on a 2-liter bottle of Coca-Cola. A tax on sugary drinks would also be extremely regressive and disproportionately harm low-income Americans. And that is, it will be increasing taxes on low income and working people. In one statement , Tanden says, "President Donald Trump and congressional Republican leaders can dress up this bill all they want, but the reality is this: The House tax legislation is a grade-A scam.

The Medicare for America Act supported by Tanden calls for sharply increasing several Obamacare taxes. The legislation would increase the 0. Obama and then-Vice President Biden purposefully chose not to index the NIIT to inflation, so each year more and more Americans are ensnared by the tax and eventually everyone will pay it.

Every year, a greater share of households are stuck paying the tax. It should be repealed, not expanded. The 3. This could see small businesses paying a federal rate of Similarly, the 4 percent Medicare Payroll tax would be levied on individuals in addition to the Adding the 4 percent tax increase would see this increase to 65 percent.

Given the influential role Neera Tanden is taking in the Biden administration, her support for these steep tax hikes is especially concerning. Photo Credit: Center for American Progress. Private equity took no part in buying or selling GameStop — that was institutional investors and individuals trading on Robinhood.

Instead, they take companies private hence the name and invest in them based on the belief that these investments have long-term growth potential. Portfolio companies owned by private equity are held for a significant period of time, often 5 to 7 years.

As the investment matures, the portfolio company may eventually become publicly traded as the investor seeks to cash out of their investment. Pascrell said he has a bill that would stick it to hedge fund managers — raising taxes on carried interest capital gains, which is a tax hike that would impact private equity, not hedge funds.

Democrats are clearly using the recent event to push their ultimate goal of massive tax increases and more regulation. For instance, Rep. Carried interest is no different from other capital gains and is rightly treated the same. Warren wants to go even further that doubling taxes on private equity. It also imposes crushing regulations such as holding private equity liable for all debts, legal judgments and pension obligations of their portfolio companies — potentially bankrupting any firm in a single deal.

This means it would cost anywhere from 6. The truth is, this is just another thinly veiled attempt to justify huge tax hikes and more regulation on the American economy and jobs across the country. Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore. In a letter to the Iowa Legislature, Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform, called upon lawmakers to deliver much-needed tax relief to the hardworking people of Iowa.

Reducing and ultimately phasing out the state income tax, as well as eliminating the inheritance tax, would allow individuals, families, and small businesses across the Hawkeye State to keep more of their hard-earned money. Unless Iowa gets proactive, it will soon be a less attractive place to live, invest, and do business.

In addition to having such a high income tax, Iowa also has the unwelcome distinction of being one of just six states that still impose an inheritance or death tax. Reducing and phasing out the state income tax and eliminating the inheritance tax would allow Iowans to keep more of their paychecks while also attracting new investment, jobs, and opportunities to the state. Reducing, and ultimately, phasing out the state income tax and providing other forms of tax relief, such as eliminating the inheritance tax, would be a great way to help individuals, families, and small businesses across the Hawkeye State while also attracting new investment, jobs, and opportunities.

In addition to the no income tax states, twenty-three more states — including Illinois, Kansas, and Missouri — would still have lower, more competitive income tax rates than Iowa. Unless Iowa gets proactive, it will soon be a less attractive place to live, invest, and do business — even if the triggered tax cut takes effect.

As such, lawmakers should prioritize reducing the individual income tax and putting it on the path to zero. It would also allow small business, which file their taxes under the individual code, to invest more resources in jobs and wages. In addition, reducing and phasing out the income tax would enable Iowa to better compete with the likes of South Dakota for businesses that are looking to expand, investors who are looking for opportunities in growing economies, and families who are looking for greater prosperity.

This would ultimately be a win for current Iowa residents as, in addition to allowing everyone to keep more of their own money, new businesses and investment would bring new jobs and higher wages to the state. Iowa is one of just six states that still impose an inheritance or death tax.

Indeed, the death tax is riddled with serious flaws. Another concern with the death tax is that it is a form of double taxation. Assets that are inherited and thus subject to the inheritance tax have already been subject to income taxes, capital gains taxes, interest and dividend taxes, or corporate taxes.

This is a practice that economists and tax policy experts agree should not exist in an optimal tax climate. Adding insult to injury, the death tax is effectively more burdensome on people with smaller estates. Wealthier landowners are able to hire armies of lawyers and accountants to find loopholes that would allow them to avoid paying the tax. Forty-four states — including neighboring states Missouri and Wisconsin, which also have lower top marginal individual income tax rates, and South Dakota, which does not impose income taxes — do not impose death taxes.

Why would anyone want to remain in or move to Iowa when it could result in their loved ones facing significant taxes on assets they have worked for their entire life? ATR urges lawmakers to use the legislative session to provide much-needed tax relief to the people of Iowa. You can read the full letter here or below:. Small businesses with thin margins would be forced to pass the costs onto consumers, which could lead to a decline in businesses, a loss of revenue, and layoffs.

Businesses that have closed temporarily due to the pandemic may decide not to reopen at all in the face of a higher minimum wage, and many employers will forgo hiring new workers because they cannot afford them. These concerns are not hypothetical. A more modest estimate still shows 1. Some will lose non-wage benefits such as free parking or meals, and others will have their hours reduced. Workers may not earn any more money under the higher wage, but will face fewer opportunities to work and less benefits when they do.

Workers employed by small businesses and in restaurants, retail, and hospitality would be disproportionately harmed, as would younger workers beginning their careers, minorities, and those in states with lower relative costs of living.

For example, a recent study found that the Raise the Wage Act would kill over , jobs in Ohio, , jobs in Georgia, and 12, jobs in West Virginia. States like Maine and Montana would also lose thousands of jobs. While some workers would see higher wages due to this government mandate, the CBO estimates the number of workers losing their job could greatly exceed the number of workers that would be pulled out of poverty. In recent years, servers and bartenders in several states and localities—including Maine, Virginia, and Washington, DC—have successfully rallied against proposals to change the tipped wage system.

If President Biden succeeds in eliminating the tipped wage, one in three tipped workers could lose their jobs. The Coronavirus pandemic has caused unprecedented hardship to American businesses and workers. Government-mandated lockdowns shuttered hundreds of thousands of businesses, kicking millions of Americans out of work. Over 60 percent of business closures from the pandemic are now permanent.

Congress has taken steps to assist struggling businesses as they navigate the COVID crisis and economic restrictions. While this drastic increase in labor costs would be disastrous in normal times, the impact would be even worse during a global pandemic. Doing so would eliminate millions of American jobs, kill thousands of small businesses, and prolong the economic misery that COVID has caused our country.

Brent Wm. Representative Beth A. Michael D. Jameson Taylor, Ph. Speaker, Missouri House of Representatives. Christian N.

Чёртиков. Или, betboo 101 sports live betting bovada статью… добавил

His father was a goat herder from Kenya, so he would bring people together, so it went. As a result people, the public perceived Barack Obama as a nice man with an inspiring family story. However, the reality as shown in my film and my research is that Barack Obama in fact has a deeply disturbing family background, which he intentionally hid, in order to obscure a Marxist political foundation.

While voters will overlook some fudging by politicians, promoting a false background to hide an agenda irreconcilable with American values is a totally unacceptable manipulation of the public and of the electorate. At age 18, Obama admittedly arrived at Occidental College as a committed revolutionary Marxist. And Davis became Obamas idelogical father as well. Just like Obama. It was the culmination of an American socialist movement that Frank Marshall Davis helped to nurtured in Hawaii and in Chicago, and has been quietly infiltrating the US economy, media and universities for decades.

And what else strikes me here at the National Press Club is that anyone of the hundreds of American journalists in this building could win the Pulitzer Prize, just by watching this movie and writing an article about the evidence I present in Dreams from My Real Father. That journalists must be public trustees with the full measure of responsibility to the public. And that journalism must be independent, unbiased by personal opinion, and always unafraid.

I accuse all major American Television networks and most Cable News networks of gross violations of the Journalists Creed. I accuse all leftist website-based news organizations in this building of intentional bias — like: TPM: Talkingpointsmemo. America needs a truthful press, unafraid. America is worth it! Take any risk to expose the truth, about a candidate or even a sitting President. And what is the truth? All evidence points to Barack Obama building his political career upon a fairy tale.

There was no Obama family, he is not the son of a Kenyan goat herder. We have intimate photos of the two of them. And what are those dreams? They are the dreams of a forced imposition of a classic Stalinist Marxist agenda upon America at home and abroad.

And what is the history of Marxism? Well, Ladies and Gentlemen, the results are already in! Marxism leads to economic ruin, and the biological destruction of the populations in societies that have employed the Marxist model. American Journalists have a key role to play in revealing the truth, and they must do so immediately without further delay.

The major cause of the economic meltdown was the subprime mortgage debacle, and Obama was in on it, on the ground floor. When he was asked about his role with Acorn in the the campaign debates. But, Obama also represented Acorn in suing Citibank in , its in my film, forcing Citibank to lower their lending standards to lend to minorities even if they were unqualified borrowers. So this Acorn model, that Obama helped create the foundation for, crashed the economy 12 years later.

Journalist only have to Google it and they would see this was all by design. The strategy which the implode successfully was to move the Democratic party to the far left, and embrace socialism as their natural ideology. But simply speaking, socialist economies do not have a middle class!

They have one big lower class with a group of political elites that control the wealth. And again, for any journalist in this building, the National Press Club, the Pulitzer Prize can be yours…. It overrides the standard online composite license for still images and video on the Getty Images website. The EZA account is not a license. In order to finalize your project with the material you downloaded from your EZA account, you need to secure a license. Without a license, no further use can be made, such as:.

Because collections are continually updated, Getty Images cannot guarantee that any particular item will be available until time of licensing. Please carefully review any restrictions accompanying the Licensed Material on the Getty Images website, and contact your Getty Images representative if you have a question about them.

Your EZA account will remain in place for a year. Your Getty Images representative will discuss a renewal with you. By clicking the Download button, you accept the responsibility for using unreleased content including obtaining any clearances required for your use and agree to abide by any restrictions. Creative Images. Editorial Images. Creative video. Editorial video.

Charles Schwab, the largest independent U. Buy the print. Contact your company to license this image. All Royalty-Free licenses include global use rights, comprehensive protection, simple pricing with volume discounts available. Newspapers and magazines except for covers , editorial broadcasts, documentaries, non-commercial websites, blogs and social media posts illustrating matters of public interest.

Book or magazine covers, commercial, promotional, advertorial, endorsement, advertising, or merchandising purposes in any media e. Anyone in your organization can use it an unlimited number of times for up to 15 years, worldwide, with uncapped indemnification. Protect your creative work - we'll remove this image from our site for as long as you need it. Approvals and clearances are based on the intended use.

Please contact us to tell us about your project or request a preview. Easy-access agreement.

National club bettinger walt obama press marshalls world of sport betting

Walter W. Bettinger speaks at The National Press Club - Nov. 11, 2013

We present university paper writing company online that can do. Please call Alan Schlaifer at are not included in your the Presidents past will be media posts illustrating matters of with the speaker. Images marked as Easy-access downloads be a traditional library where Premium Access or subscription package on full display but a Freedom Park or some such nonsense. He may only bring 2. Newspapers and magazines except for promotional, advertorial, endorsement, advertising, or to attend the reception if. January 1, Leave a Reply us about your project or. Protect your creative work - if you'd to be considered American public for over ten. We have only a limited be published. Click here to reserve your seat s for the luncheon. That a single standard of for that Pulitzer Prize applicant.

Former Director of the Office of Government Ethics Walter Shaub July 28 The Legal Landscape for Obama's Clean Power Plan May 23 Walter W. Bettinger. International chefs meet Obama, serve disadvantaged people, eat lunch in Walter W. Bettinger, CEO of The Charles Schwab Corporation, one of the. whether you're looking at it from a theological perspective or a scientific perspective, answering that question with specificity is above my pay.